LuciusDickusMaximus's reddit snoovatar

LuciusDickusMaximus Archive

April 3rd, 2024

0

/r/The10thDentist

2 years ago

Nuclear warfare is just another branch of the instant gratification trend

For most of human history, wars have been long and tough. Each victory had to be earned on the field through hard work and superior troop coordination. And each of those battles were just building blocks in the grand scheme of an entire war. So when you won a war and changed the course of history, you knew that you had truly earned it through years of blood, sweat, tears, and many brave lives.

Yet, just like we built iPhones to bring us instant gratification in the form of Instagram likes in the place of earned self-satisfaction, we had to build something that would replace earned warfare: nuclear weapons. Now we can conquer entire civilizations with literally the click of a button. The Hundred Years War would be the One Minute “War” today.

I do not envy the future historians who are going to have to read about the 21st century, when all humans did was click different buttons that gave them quick dopamine rushes. One button gets you a video of a monkey playing the saxophone, one ends life for millions.

We are a disgraceful lot.

April 3rd, 2024

0

Comments:

AutoModerator

2 years ago

Upvote the POST if you disagree, Downvote the POST if you agree.

REPORT the post if you suspect the post breaks subs rules/is fake.

Normal voting rules for all comments.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

MrGritty17

2 years ago

Tell me you’re 12 without telling me you’re 12. Jesus..

15

fuck-illinois1621

2 years ago

Oh thats not

16

action__andy

2 years ago

This is so fucking stupid LOL

11

Maverekt

2 years ago

For the people wanting to know the post when it gets deleted:

For most of human history, wars have been long and tough. Each victory had to be earned on the field through hard work and superior troop coordination. And each of those battles were just building blocks in the grand scheme of an entire war. So when you won a war and changed the course of history, you knew that you had truly earned it through years of blood, sweat, tears, and many brave lives.

Yet, just like we built iPhones to bring us instant gratification in the form of Instagram likes in the place of earned self-satisfaction, we had to build something that would replace earned warfare: nuclear weapons. Now we can conquer entire civilizations with literally the click of a button. The Hundred Years War would be the One Minute “War” today.

I do not envy the future historians who are going to have to read about the 21st century, when all humans did was click different buttons that gave them quick dopamine rushes. One button gets you a video of a monkey playing the saxophone, one ends life for millions.

We are a disgraceful lot.

12

No-Attention9838

2 years ago

This is what happens when you write an opinion like you're doing a connect-the-dots puzzle with no regard for numerical order

10

UPBOAT_FORTRESS_2

2 years ago

For most of human history, wars have been long and tough. Each victory had to be earned on the field through hard work and superior troop coordination. And each of those battles were just building blocks in the grand scheme of an entire war. So when you won a war and changed the course of history, you knew that you had truly earned it through years of blood, sweat, tears, and many brave lives.

Yet, just like we built the printing press to bring instant gratification in the form of the written word in the place of earned oral tradition, we had to build something that would replace earned warfare: firearms. Now we can conquer entire civilizations with literally the twitch of a finger. The Punic Wars would be the Puny "War" today

7

Significant-Ant-2487

2 years ago

We built nuclear weapons “just like” we built iPhones? They’re part of the same trend? Talk about a failed analogy! First of all, there’s over half a century separating the two. Also… no, it’s so absurd it’s not worth discussing.

5

KumaraDosha

2 years ago

Downvoting the post because it doesn’t deserve karma.

5

[deleted]

2 years ago

Thank God this take is nonsense, if it were correct then nukes would have been used at the slightest hint of conflict ever since they were developed in the name of "instant gratification" and this planet would be a radioactive crater by now.

3

NotMonsterii

2 years ago

I support this post for how controversial it is

5

actualaccountithink

2 years ago

why speak on things you don't understand?

2

Purple-Activity-194

2 years ago

marry glorious rude murky correct quiet summer chief command seed

This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact

2

SomePersonAtReddit

2 years ago

Jesse, what the fuck are you talking about

1

phooonix

2 years ago

If by "instant gratification" you mean mass suicide then sure.

1

[deleted]

2 years ago

[deleted]

89

Paul6334

2 years ago

Me telling a soldier in the 19th century anticipating the rollout of a breechloading rifle to the infantry that the instant gratification of sliding a bullet into the chamber is disgraceful and he needs the struggle to ram a bullet and charge down the muzzle of his gun while his opponents fire five bullets at him for every shot he gets in reply.

36

Deathaster

2 years ago

Girl, OP is trolling hard and you all fell for it lol

Report em

2

PreviousComedian4263

2 years ago

What even is this take? Like am seeing your line of thought and it doesn't make any sense . If you could ask anyone who died in a war if they would rather " instant gratification " or a long drawn out war where millions of people die I wonder what they would say. The people in war aren't trying to earn anything, they're trying to make it home alive, maybe in one piece.

36

YEETAWAYLOL

2 years ago

But the honor!!!1!

2

makeItSoAlready

2 years ago

Wernt nukes used only one time in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during war time? I pray that nukes are never used again, but I'm wondering, when you're talking about future historians referring to the instant gratification of war, is your assumption that they'll make stuff up or that we will have more nuclear wars?

10

[deleted]

2 years ago

Let’s think about the goals of war. Perhaps you would use a Nuke in times of desperation but from a strategic perspective, it would be stupid to say, Nuke a country if you want to invade it.

1

thebohemiancowboy

2 years ago

Comments disagree with this mf and yet he has zero upvotes.

This sub has gone to shit.

[deleted]

2 years ago

Probably because a lot of us remember the "lack of knowledge" rule where a complete fuckwad idiotic take like this would be removed. We're not supporting people posting something stupid because they want upvotes

4