November 15th, 2019
0
November 15th, 2019
0
11
Glad I'm not the only one confused as fuck. I read it 2 times trying to find this shit.
3
“Most historians”.
No.
10
9
Thank you! I combed through it twice thinking I missed it somewhere.
5
8
Obviously he pooped them out.
4
It said that those two didn't have kids but he helped her rear two children from a previous marriage...I didn't see the crossdressing part though.
2
it said that she had 4 kids from a previous marriage
2
Meh...moreover, none were his.
1
Right, but the claim is that she was a man, so the father of her children is irrelevant, that she had children is what's important here.
2
7
6
5
4
5
2
Oh look a wild transphobic hick appears.
0
Phobe? Who's afraid of what??
0