October 21st, 2020
33
October 21st, 2020
33
1
Blue = Senior, Red = Junior, Green = Sophomore, Light-Blue is non-student residents (auditors, TAs, adjuncts, etc.)
The outlying points are the NAs that I couldn't remove due to time constraints
4
This should be in the image and/or the top comment
3
That in person schools are a horible idea once your infection rate is over 2%.
5
Hahaha nah mate the data is pre-corona, I just had it sitting in my Drive
4
Yes but high school kids are still gonna find ways to make out.
1
For comparison, a map of my hookups:
.
1
Thank you for your Original Content, /u/LuciusDickusMaximus!
Here is some important information about this post:
Remember that all visualizations on r/DataIsBeautiful should be viewed with a healthy dose of skepticism. If you see a potential issue or oversight in the visualization, please post a constructive comment below. Post approval does not signify that this visualization has been verified or its sources checked.
Not satisfied with this visual? Think you can do better? Remix this visual with the data in the author's citation.
1
Source: A google forms survey I made just for my friend group and somehow got popular and got responses from 99% of the student body
Tools: Ran a regression in R Studio Markdown and assigned all classes a different color, then assigned everyone a unique point. Used the Hmisc package to correlate mutual hookups using a dummy variable 1 if you hooked up with a specific person and 0 if you did not. Took the resulting data frame, made it into a csv and used my buddy Jiv's data mapper which is currently in beta and got this data map
Edit: A word
21
ALSO IMPORTANT: The dummy variable =1 only if both people had included the other in the response. A lot of the Points that go way outside of the circle and have circles, squares, or triangles were NAs, people who claimed to have hooked up with someone who didn't claim to have hooked up with them. It was too difficult for me to remove these with the limited time I had to make this
8
15
Yeah, this is far from beautiful data. It seems like what's important should be the hubs, but the organization and color coding the map take the focus away from the hubs and make them hard to distinguish. And there's no explanation of why the rings show up. It can't possibly be that all the individuals in the rings hooked up with the same person.
6
10
Depends how you slice it up. On the whole, women reported more hookups. This is true until you look at it conditional on the fact that the people had more than 6 hookups, where both genders are neck in neck. Over 11, men take the lead, though not by much
3
9
Hahaha it was literally just a google form meant for some friends and friends or friends and then some girls started trying to get everyone to take it
6
5
2
Unless they had access to someone else's school gmail account, none
2
2
SLPT - filter by the gender you’re interested in and create a short list of the easy lays.
You can use this to your own advantage or to profit from.
Lol that's not my style but I don't judge. It was actually very surprising seeing how much the people I thought were really conservative Catholics got around
6
You crave the things you’re not supposed to do. We knew this in high school, good girls want to be bad.
You really could have something here. The applications could be incredibly useful from studying social sciences to std tracking and more.
Don’t think about the money, think about how you could change the world, if you do it right, the money will follow.
The participation rate should tell you something... companies spend millions trying to gather data and you’re just like hey guys who did you fuck and everybody like 👉👆👇👈
2