My buddy told me to post here.

The whole argument of statistics depends on the belief that everyone is equally lucky. For example, if both person A and B go to a club, in your world, both have an equal chance of getting laid that night. But the fact is, a lot of it depends on being in the right place at the right time. It depends on a persons luck.

Think of a person you know who you consider to be lucky. I guarantee you know several people who, their whole lives, have been successful just by chance. The person who always makes half court shots even though they never play basketball. If statistics were as numerical as they are being presented, these people would not exist.

I think Dream is one of these lucky people. I mean, think about it. He didn’t go to college and achieved YouTube success so rapidly. You can’t tell me that’s just hard work or dedication or clickbait. Millions of bozos every day post millions of clickbait videos, and the fact that dream was the one who made it out of all those people is just lucky.

In conclusion, yes, statistics can be useful for things like coin flips or sports or even the economy at times, but to rely on them solely in this case is stupid. Dream is just a lucky person, not a cheater.